[lbo-talk] The misuse of political movements for essentially religious ends

Joseph Catron jncatron at gmail.com
Wed Dec 23 12:15:25 PST 2015


Al right, all right. But you wiseacres know what I mean. A practicing Christian will, generally speaking, not expect the role of Jesus to be filled by Sandra Bland.

Shane, the Chalcedonian definition is not "dogma for all branches of Christianity." It was explicitly rejected by churches that became the Oriental Orthodox communion.

Hence their identity as "non-Chalcedonian," to say nothing of their enduring split with Eastern Orthodoxy and all its offspring: Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, etc.

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Shane Mage <shmage at pipeline.com> wrote:


>
> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Joseph Catron wrote:
> > A Christian confused
> > about who Jesus is and is not would be an unusual sort of Christian
> indeed!
>
> On the contrary, confusion about the Jew Y'shua is fundamental to all
> forms of Christian belief. What can be more confused than the Chalcedonian
> doctrine--dogma for all branches of Christianity--that the Jew Y'shua was
> both "wholly man and wholly God?" All Christians, the usual and unusual
> equally, are imbricated in that confusion (as well as all sorts of others).
>
> Shane Mage
>
>
> This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it
> always was and is and shall be: an everlasting fire,
> kindling in measures and going out in measures.
>
> Herakleitos of Ephesos
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

-- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað."



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list