On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Lenin's Tomb <leninstombblog at googlemail.com
> wrote:
> Really, I unsubscribed from LBO Talk some time ago, but I’m still getting
> Charles Brown’s bigoted bullshit. Please take it away.
>
> > On 28 Apr 2016, at 14:53, Charles Brown <cb31450 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > For our species to continue surviving, the human line could not lose its
> sexual instinct until it was possible for reproduction to be relatively
> assured without it. And this was only possible after humans had first found
> a benefit in producing offspring (realizing that children could provide
> care and protection in old age), and then discovered what caused
> reproduction (linking heterosexual intercourse to it). The tremendous
> insight required for both discoveries was only made possible by a
> sufficiently high intelligence level.
> > ///
> >
> > Human species never lost its Herero-sexual instinct.
> >
> > Nothing in either discovery the article mentions would cause selection
> against hetero-sexual instinct (!). Lack of hetero-sexual instinct would
> continue to have a much lower Darwinian fitness than having
> heterosexual-sexual instinct , because those with Herero-sexual instinct
> would have a much greater number of fertile sexual acts than those lacking
> it. It is patent that Differential fertility between having and lacking
> heterosexual instinct would be enormous .
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Apr 13, 2016, at 2:48 PM, magcomm <magcomm at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear All:
> >>
> >>> . . . for the secret of this approach has its unambiguous, decisive,
> plain and undisguised expression in the relation of man to woman and in the
> manner in which the direct and natural species-relationship is conceived.
> The direct, natural, and necessary relation of person to person is the
> relation of man to woman.
> >>
> >> Philosophy, poetry and (you forgot to add Charles) transphobic nonsense
> (except to the new breed of toilet monitors who are emerging below the
> Mason-Dixon line).
> >>
> >>> . . . humanity is essentially non-essential."
> >>
> >> Buddhist thinkers arrived at the same conclusion a few hundred years
> prior. Correct then; correct now.
> >>
> >>> So, Foucault took license to erase the scientific fact of heterosexual
> instinct from anthropology and the philosophy of human nature. Foul deed !
> Anti-Marxist big lie !
> >>
> >> This article from the Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical
> Association explains about the lack of sexual instinct. The author does
> note that "the instinct requiring the largest compensating intelligence
> level before it can be lost is the sexual instinct." I hope other list
> members will join me in wishing Charles swift attainment of just such a
> compensating intelligence level.
> >>
> >> http://www.humansexualevolution.com/index.htm
> >>
> >> Brian
> >> ___________________________________
> >> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk