> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:42 AM, JOANNA A. <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Clinton distancing herself from the DP machine?
>
> So loathed that she would be unable to get DP nomination, but she could win as a third party candidate?
>
> ???
>
> Joanna
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
>
>> A staged “unity” event in New Hampshire on the weekend by the conservative pro-Clinton Democratic party leadership evidently did nothing to bridge the wide gulf which separates it from the swelling number of Sanders supporters at the base of the party...
>> ...These half-hearted Democrats would be prime material for the formation of a viable third party...'
>
> Headline from today's FT: "Republican executives eye Clinton vote." Last weekend's hysterical outbursts from Steinem, Albright, even from the Big Dog and his Biggest Bitch themselves, show the Clinton nomination campaign in full implosion. Right now it starts to look like a "Third Party (TM)" will show up giant-sized on the Media Billboard. It would be the Clinton doing a Lieberman, backed by a Bloomberg-led gaggle of Billionaires, as the "No Labels" candidate. Perhaps, for BiPartisanships sake, with Jeb! as her Veep. Be prepared.
>
>
>
> Shane Mage
>
> "Thunderbolt steers all things." Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr. 64
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk