[lbo-talk] Democratic disunity

[Shane Mage]

Since the VP candidate would inevitably be Warren, and Gore having realized the real dimensions of the climate crisis and moved (see his books and speeches) very far to the "left" since his disastrous 2000 campaign, that might well be a more than acceptable alternative to a clueless social-democrat like Sanders.

On Feb 8, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Steven L. Robinson wrote:


> More likely, imo, the Dem leadership will - as in 1968 - pull a Hubert Humphrey out of their hat and run either Biden or Gore in place of the failed Hillary.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----...'
> 
> Headline from today's FT: "Republican executives eye Clinton vote." Last weekend's hysterical outbursts from Steinem, Albright, even from the Big Dog and his Biggest Bitch themselves, show the Clinton nomination campaign in full implosion. Right now it starts to look like a "Third Party (TM)" will show up giant-sized on the Media Billboard. It would be the Clinton doing a Lieberman, backed by a Bloomberg-led gaggle of Billionaires, as the "No Labels" candidate. Perhaps, for BiPartisanships sake, with Jeb! as her Veep. Be prepared.
> 
> 
> 
> Shane Mage
> 
> "Thunderbolt steers all things." Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr. 64
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk