You have no clue what science is, or what a "scientific world outlook" is. The latter is an an outlook of skepticism and openess -- a willingness to let your beliefs go where the evidence leads. It is not preaching dogma in materialist garb. Dogma is dogma, regardless of the vocabulary used. Preaching dogma is not what those with a "scientific world outlook" do. It's what priests do.
Those with a scientific world outlook follow the evidence: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150213112317.htm http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/gender-its-complicated/
And how is "sexual reproduction" "literally the FIRST THING about biology" when the most primitive organisms did not reproduce sexually? You are clueless.
These rants are pathetic.
On 05/10/2016 02:25 PM, Charles Brown wrote:
> knowledge of natural sciences like biology is also basic Marxism. Marxists must be materialists , which is to say have a scientific world outlook . Can't have a scientific world outlook and not know literally the FIRST THING about biology , which is the principle of sexual reproduction. It's appalling ignorance instituted by capitalist sexual repression in the Freudian sense.
>
> Marxists critique , but engage Freud; the post mod psychologists have taken Bourgeois psychology a big step backwards from Freud, who as I say , was not perfect at all.
>
> There is a need for focused Marxist psychology; in analyzing advertising and other bourgeois methods of brainwashing and even healing some of the proletariat . Marxist psychology would be rooted in Marx's theory of alienation.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk