[lbo-talk] NY Times: Sanders supporters lament what might have been

Marv Gandall marvgand2 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 11:42:31 PDT 2016


A reputable poll earlier this month showed Sanders as the most highly regarded politician in the United States.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/10/bernie-sanders-polling-favorability-trump-hillary-clinton/

Had Sanders somehow managed to win the nomination, however, many of Clinton’s supporters would have stayed home, and the election would have turned on whether the inevitable vicious red-baiting by a united Republican party would have retained enough of its traditional toxicity to overwhelm Sanders’ personal appeal and popular social policies.

*****

In Hindsight, Backers of Bernie Sanders Lament What Might Have Been By Matt Flegenheimer and Yamiche Alcindor New York Times Oct 18 2016

Even to skeptics, the presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders has often appeared less quixotic with the benefit of hindsight.

If Mr. Sanders had only edged Hillary Clinton in Iowa — and not the other way around — before winning a blowout in New Hampshire, perhaps things would have been different.

If he had only attacked Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state, instead of offering her a reprieve, some supporters lamented, perhaps things would have been different.

And now, as Mrs. Clinton contends with daily disclosures from the hacked messages of top campaign aides — missives that have reinforced the central progressive criticisms of her bid, including her coziness with Wall Street — some of Mr. Sanders’s admirers have been compelled to consider again what might have been.

Full: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/19/us/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign.html?action=click&contentCollection=us&module=NextInCollection&region=Footer&pgtype=article&version=newsevent&rref=collection%2Fnews-event%2Felection-2016



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list