I've been thinking about how in the past few years it has become ok to target capitalism as such, as opposed to corporate whatever.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:16 PM Andy <andy274 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Joseph Catron <jncatron at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Andy <andy274 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You might mention and explore how the term "corporation" has replaced
> >> "capital" in most every contemporary critique or complaint, and what's
> >> wrong with that. I think just bringing it up might get gears turning.
> > Yeah. Some of the stuff Liza wrote in Students Against Sweatshops about
> > weakness of anti-corporate thought could prove quite timely.
> It could be quite simple. So corps are bad. Are privately held
> companies ok? Don't the Koch bros. (or insert other obvious baddie)
> have privately held companies? Small ones, then? How small? Hedge
> fund small? You could start well within a well-worn narrative and
> push the way out.
-- Andy "It's a testament to ketchup that there can be no confusion."