I've been thinking about how in the past few years it has become ok to target capitalism as such, as opposed to corporate whatever.
Interesting times!
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:16 PM Andy <andy274 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Joseph Catron <jncatron at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Andy <andy274 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You might mention and explore how the term "corporation" has replaced
> >> "capital" in most every contemporary critique or complaint, and what's
> >> wrong with that. I think just bringing it up might get gears turning.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah. Some of the stuff Liza wrote in Students Against Sweatshops about
> the
> > weakness of anti-corporate thought could prove quite timely.
>
> It could be quite simple. So corps are bad. Are privately held
> companies ok? Don't the Koch bros. (or insert other obvious baddie)
> have privately held companies? Small ones, then? How small? Hedge
> fund small? You could start well within a well-worn narrative and
> push the way out.
>
>
> --
> Andy
>
-- Andy "It's a testament to ketchup that there can be no confusion."