the global melodrama

Brad De Long delong at econ.Berkeley.EDU
Wed Aug 19 05:54:40 PDT 1998


IMF Lacked Cash to Stem Ruble's Latest Plunge, Raising Questions

By BOB DAVIS Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- The International Monetary Fund

failed to prop up the Russian ruble this

past weekend because it didn't have enough money --

raising questions about the scope and

effectiveness of future bailouts.

During the past year, the IMF has committed

about $47 billion to Indonesia, South Korea,

Thailand and Russia. By U.S. calculations, the

fund has less than $10 billion for future

rescues. To cobble together an additional

$11.2 billion for Russia last month, the IMF had to

tap a credit line of about $24 billion, which hadn't

been used since 1978, to obtain $8.3 billion

of the money. (Roughly $16 billion in remaining

credit could also be used for future rescues

under specific conditions.)

Hard Pressed

According to one IMF official, the fund would be

hard-pressed to assist in another large

bailout. Indeed, during the past weekend, it turned

down Russian officials who informally

were seeking more money to prop up their battered

currency. The most important reason,

officials involved in the discussion say, is that the

IMF couldn't afford the $15 billion to $20

billion that Russia analysts have argued was

necessary to bolster confidence.

The IMF's financial problems don't preclude it from

working with the World Bank, Asian

Development Bank and major industrial nations to

formulate new crisis programs to deal with

problems that broadly threaten the world economy. The

fund's available credit line could be

used for problems of that scale. Rather, the fund might

have to cut back on smaller programs

that are aimed at heading off potential crises in such

nations as South Africa or Turkey, an

official said.

Forcing Change

Morris Goldstein, researcher at the Institute

for International Economics and a former IMF

senior economist, said a cash crunch would force

the fund to change how it does business.

Without IMF money, he predicted, more nations

would default on their debt and reschedule

payments, and foreign currencies would become

even more volatile. "If the money isn't

there," Mr. Goldstein said, "you'll have to use

the instruments that are available."

The U.S. Treasury Department has campaigned, without

success, for congressional approval

of $18 billion to boost the fund's reserves. Part

would help double the fund's credit line to $48

billion; another portion would be pooled with

funding from other nations to boost usable IMF

reserves by about $60 billion.

"Quite simply, not to invest in an effective IMF

would be like canceling your life insurance

when you have just gotten sick," said Deputy

Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers earlier

this month in a speech to the National Governors

Association. But the administration's IMF

request has bogged down in the House.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list