[Seth Ackerman] Doug Henwood wrote
> What magazines are interesting by this criterion?
>
> And I think it matters who's saying these things. If you're no fan of
> Corn
> or Mojo, why not read their positions as apologias for conformist crap
> rather than calls for against-the-grain liveliness?
>
>
The Baffler is interesting by that criterion. (Not to mention LBO). As
for Corn and Mojo, I think you're right. But the "non-conformist"
element of the left press (say, the Progressive) is a snooze, and
sometimes worse.
Seth Ackerman