Yes, "decent" should be defined right now, I agree with that. In fact, it would be defined in part in terms of a minimum wage.
I don't usually think of the "decent" issue as referring to what you raise about jobs people don't want to do. There is also garbage collector and dead body fetchers, window washing on tall buildings , mining. I can't see anyway but paying a premium, as you suggest. Also, how about rotating the jobs ?Everybody does a tour of unpleasant jobs.
Anyway, there are too different "decent" issues, if you follow me. The decent I am referring to is basically, decent pay, but certainly there must be more focus on workplace safety.
Charles Brown
Detroit
Workers of the West, it's our turn.
>>> <MScoleman writes
In a message dated 98-08-25 14:41:30 EDT, charles brown writes:
<< I support a Constitutional Amendment for
a right to a decent job. The right
of private property in the basic means
of production protected by the Fifth
Amendment would be subordinated
to this right. >>
i agree with this, but decent job needs to be defined in some broad sense/ right now, these workfare programs are getting people jobs... also, there are some jobs no one really wants to do (cleaning babies and old people's butts) but which are pretty necessary in any society. do we define additional payments for these jobs?
maggie coleman mscoleman at aol.com