Last shot at Brad before I go to England was Re: Answer Doug. Re: First world prosperity

Brad De Long delong at econ.Berkeley.EDU
Thu Aug 27 07:26:29 PDT 1998



>I keep saying this and maybe one day you will come to realize the point I
>am making. What happened and happens in Cuba etc cannot be divorced from
>the totality of the underlying relationality between America and Cuba etc.
>
>The construction of a communist nation does not take place in a vacuum. The
>USA intervenes and tries to bring about a counter revolution. By and large
>they are brilliantly successful at this.

I agree that the U.S. made sure that neither Allende, Arbenz, nor the Sandanistas had *any* chance of building a good society. I suspect that their chances were very slim in any event (which may be a defensive rationalization), but slim is different from zero. I agree that U.S. policy toward Afghanistan since 1979 has been *criminal* and *counterprodutive*: there are things much worse than post-Stalin and post-Mao really existing socialism, and U.S. policy has created them in Afghanistan today.

My "favorite," however, remains the U.S. "tilt" toward Pakistan and away from India during 1970-1: strong U.S. support for Yahya Khan's attempt to kill everyone who could read in what is now Bangladesh. Approve of the killing of a million people just because the Pakistani government had let itself be used as a base so Henry Kissinger could meet with Zhou Enlai without alerting William Rogers...

I agree that the U.S. embargo of Cuba is *stupid,* *counterproductive,* and cruel.

But I don't think Cuba would be much different today if U.S. governments over the past generation had treated it as they treated Poland. And I don't think that the U.S. had much to do with the destiny of the Soviet Union, China, or their Eurasian satellites...

Brad Delong



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list