JH:
> This is just guilt-tripping rubbish. If all white people are
> intrinsicaly racist then any progressive project is doomed from the
> outset.
Quite right, though the statement itself is sufficiently broad and wide-ranging that one cannot dismiss every included assertion.
> . . .
> It is a shame that just when a number of young and working class people
> were distancing themselves from the outlook of the US establishment and
> the fictitious community of American nationalism, here is the SNCC
> insisting that, no on the contrary, all white people have a common
> interest in racial oppression.
It may not be obvious but my impression is that the SNCC statement is a good thirty years old. It has no current significance at all. SNCC no longer exists. It derives from Stokely Charmichael's move to expel whites from SNCC, which was a major, negative development in radical politics. Charmichael himself hasn't done anything positive since. A documentary on SNCC including archival footage showed SC as one jive turkey. I myself attended a speech by him many years ago (well after the SNCC turn) featuring explicit jew-baiting, a perfect example of the case of negative nationalism which can only have the effect of driving whites to the right.
JH again:
> . . .
> This is the classic difference between moralism and Marxism. The SNCC
> statement is a moral critique of racism, which appeals to guilty white
> liberals, to recognise their culpability, and hang their heads in shame.
> But it does not appeal to the working class to break from the ruling
> racial ideology on the basis of their material interests.
> It is an appeal addressed not to class interest but to middle class
> guilt.
In addition, it reflects an inept effort to claim leadership of that which it cannot win by force of positive persuasion. Otherwise known as selling wolf tickets.
MBS