Moore, Remy, & Fortune

Yoshie Furuhashi furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Thu May 21 08:20:49 PDT 1998


Tom Kruse wrote:
>Humor is central to US political discourse -- right and less right. Not so
>here, where the last preseident Sanchez de Lozada, caused QUITE a stri by
>being publicly funny and president at the same time. Notabley, his humor
>was VERY gringo -- he was raised in the US; U Chicago grad. Makes me
>wonder: was humor always central to political discourse in the US? Or is
>this a new (say, post WWII) thing?

I don't know about history, but witty put-downs, fast talk, facial cues to point to what is to be laughed at + dismissed, etc. go very well with the mass media, especially when programs are compressed and fragmented by commercials. So I think that though humor may have been always central to US political discourse, the nature of humor must have changed over time. You don't have a time to tell tall tales that require repetitions and narrative momentum any longer.

Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list