>Trond Andresen wrote:
>>>And, answering myself, I should add that I bet that American purity
>>>thinking is behind Alterman and other vulgar versions of antipostmodernism.
>>
>>Doug, what examples can you point to of non-vulgar antipostmodernism?
>
>Terry Eagleton, for instance.
.. who I find to be nearly as difficult to read as the French pomo gurus themselves. So I gave up. Having a science/technology background, I get much more out of Noam Chomsky's or Alan Sokal's critical writings on these issues. For Sokal, see
http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/index.html
Is their stuff to simplicistic for the literature/philosphy crowd?
Trond Andresen