My real question, however, is what you make of the Harry Shutt book, "The Trouble with Capitalism", which I have been touting to people like a Trotskyite would tout the Transitional Program. I think his logic and facts are very impressive. When I was discussing the Shutt book with an old pal, who used to edit the Militant years ago, he said that he had just finished your article and the way I described Shutt seemed very close to the spirit of your NLR article.
In general, what I like about Shutt is that he removes the discussion from a value theory problematic, a la Anwar Sheikh, and simply treats the slump of the past 20 years as a necessary contradiction of the aftermath of the WWII boom. The more I think about this, the more it seems that Marxism goes astray when it loses the historical dimension. Since you are not an economist, but a historian, I am wondering if this has had a salutory effect on your thinking.
Louis Proyect (http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)