Brenner reply to Doug H.

[pms]

>"insufficient adjustment to manufacturing overcapacity,
>market by insufficient exit and too much entry." Of course on the other
>hand, Brenner blames Clinton's anti Keynesian budget balancing for
>deepening the global recession by weakening effective demand. But of
>course there may be no violation of the principle of non-contradiction
>here. We could have a global depression with or without Keynesianism. 
>
>best, rakesh
>

I love you guys. "insufficient exit and too much entry."  THERE'S TOO DAMN
MUCH ENTRY HERE, BUDDY! MOVE ALONG!

Hey, this is interesting, but I've missed alot.  Could someone send me
Doug's article.  Is it in lbo?  And Brenner's reply. If it's in lbo, don't
send, I have it. Just refer.


> Brenner is arguing that  terminating Keynesian
>stabilization may well work to revive growth.

What action's is Brenner calling Keynesian stabilization here?  What needs
to be stopped?  Lowering inyerest rates?

Thanks in advance-Paula

you know.  if we had that race war all the "kooks" are talking about. if
everyyhing got burned up.  we'd all have to buy new stuff and capitalism
could be born anew in America.