By and large I agree with your response to Marta. However it should be noted that the Catholic Church did not support the election of Hitler, even though he greatly admired the Jesuit Order and saw it as a model for his Gestapo and had his original base in highly Catholic Bavaria.
But in the election of 1932 he was opposed by the largely Catholic Center Party and did not do well in Catholic areas. His base, as I have noted before on this list, was in rural Protestant areas, at least in terms of voting support.
Of course it is also true that the Catholic Church did way too little to oppose Hitler's policies once he was in power. The Church's outrage about the disabled was indeed rather an isolated business. Barkley Rosser On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 22:37:37 -0500 James Farmelant <farmelantj at juno.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998 15:53:13 -0800 Marta Russell <ap888 at lafn.org> writes:
>
> >The point of forwarding the article was to inform. But I do have to
> >say that in
> >defense of what you call "jackbooted "pro-lifers", when the Nazis
> >started killing
> >disabled people in Germany the group which stopped Hitler and the
> >physicians was the
> >Catholic Church headed by Bishop von Galen, a conservative.
>
> That is true but I would be more impressed if the Church had similarly
> stood up against the murder of Jews, Gypsies, communists, gays
> etc. as well. Since in fact both the Catholic and Protestant churches
> were not only avid supporters of Hitler's election as chancellor in
> 1933 but remained strong supporters of the regime long afterwards
> perhaps Marta can forgive me if I seem less than impressed with
> the humanitarianism of the German clergy.
>
>
> > So I
> >hesitate to condemn
> >people with a label, when sometimes they come forth at the right time
> >and question
> >the liberals who prize themselves on being the defenders of the
> >downtrodden but often
> >act falsely. Geraldine Farraro, Pat Schroeder, Henry Waxman, Barney
> >Frank all
> >supported allowing Baby Jane Doe to die of starvation. It was
> >(surprise) Henry Hyde
> >who stood up to protect the rights of the baby under the constitution.
>
> Wasn't it Barney Frank who first said that "right to lifers" believe
> in human rights up to the moment of birth? Now we are told that
> Congressman Hyde is willing to extend human rights up to the
> first month after birth. I suppose that is progress of a sort.
>
>
> What mystifies me here is that Marta seems quick to allie herself
> with the religious right - the very same people who have no inhibitions
> about cutting back social welfare programs that benefit the disabled
> amongst others. I am not sure what political calculations are involved
> here but it all seems rather daft to me.
>
> Jim Farmelant
> >
> >I've learned not be so quick to put all the right wingers in one boat,
> >and condemn
> >them all of the time.
> >
> >Marta Russell
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
-- Rosser Jr, John Barkley rosserjb at jmu.edu