gay bashing and class

wahneema lubiano wah at acpub.duke.edu
Mon Oct 19 22:37:27 PDT 1998


There's alot of material out there that compares colonization to feminization--Frantz Fanon is one such theorist (*WRETCHED OF THE EARTH*, *BLACK SKIN,/WHITE MASKS*). Some of it can be found in the postcolonialist discourse, especially among scholars doing work on 19th century British imperialism, and theorists/writers on Pan-Africanism and Negritude--Aime Cesaire, for example. The tie between colonization and being feminized often is not argued directly, but is more available in the metaphors and similes of the writers/theorists.

Much of the writing about black nationalism and the writing of many self-identified black nationalists (whether or not explicitly homophobic) use the analogy. And back through the 18th and 17th century some racist science honed in on black people/African people in recognizably gendered terms.

Robert Park, one of the founders of the Chicago school of sociology referred to the negro race as the "lady" of the races compared to the manly anglo-saxon frontiersman race.

The Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at CUNY's Graduate Center ought to have quite a bit of references to the above kind of research.

Additionally, there's been other research and arguments with regard to the present moment that suggest some people of color express more explicitly homophobic views as a way of making space for themselves within normative public discussion. I'm not sure that I find that work com- pletely convincing; although In my own work with community, political, and/or church groups in black American communities I have found many individuals who do say that kind of thing. But absent more consistent proof of some kind, I am not ready to accept arguments for any kind of black American exceptionalism around homophobia--felt or articulated.

At 01:39 PM 10/20/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Meredith_Glueck at edf.org wrote:
>
>>when talking about the 2 guys who killed Matt Shepard, i really wonder if
>>there is all that much that differentiates them from alot of other people
>>who are prejudiced, there are plenty of people capable of doing this-i
>>don't know if a class based argument would really be valid-
>
>There's something there, I think, at least for men, as a psychological
>defense against marginalization. "I may be a lowlife but at least I'm not a
>queer." I read somewhere recently that some anticolonial discourse played
>with a colonization = ravishment trope, that the colonized man was somehow
>feminized (and no, that is not a, um, backdoor apology for imperialism). I
>don't know what to make of this, does anyone else?
>
>Doug

****************************************************************** Wahneema Lubiano Duke University, Program in Literature PHONE: (919) 681-2843 FAX: (919) 684-3598 [Note new e-mail address: wah at acpub.duke.edu]



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list