>What Hayek failed to realize is
>that his attack on central planning is logically utterrly different from his
>own promotion of provate property.
Why's that? Thought that private property was consistent with decentralized signalling, while planning assumed an impossible omniscience.
>Insofar as H is worshipped by libertarians,
>he's also unread by them, or they'd find him much less congenial.
Why's that?
Doug