>A Marxist analysis of the Clinton presidency would focus on the ways in
>which he is a continuation of Reagan and Bush. His attacks on minorities
>and the environment are extremely reactionary. But you don't need to be a
>Marxist to figure this out.
Oh gee, next you're gonna say there ain't no Easter Bunny.
>Liberals at the Nation Magazine have even begun
>to openly criticize him. At least, when they were supporting him up and
>down the line, they didn't feel the need to quote Karl Marx the way that
>Buford does.
>
>Louis Proyect
>
They must print up a special issue to send to my house. It's a liberal plot!
So Louis, all your patronizing condisension (who cares?) aside, I guess your answer is Idealogical Preening.
pm(all these big words hurt my lil ole head)s.
Institute For The Detection of Tribal Echos Dept. of Compensitory Posturing
EXPOSE CORPORATE SUBVERSION AND POLITICAL PUPPETS!