Of course, not, with your musings on 'EU hegemony' and obligatory denunciations of 'all nationalisms.'
>a consistent anti-nationalist position that is
>simultaneously against those imperial projects: demand that NATO
>countries open their borders to the refugees, alongside the demand
>that the bombing be halted.
OK to demand it (knowing that it is impossible under capitalism), but an open border demand can be also 'transmuted' into a nationalist/chauvinist one: e.g. "Let us set an example as a civilized multicultural nation." There is no 'consistent anti-nationalist position' as long as nation states in fact exist, defining the rights and obligations of citizens, mostly monopolizing the power of violence & taxation, etc.
>but I suspect you are reaching for the accusation of red-baiting not
>in order to denounce any that has actually taken place but rather in
>order to re-position you arguments as the only red ones available.
>they are not the only ones.
No. What I am objecting to is not red-baiting, but "pro-Serb-Nationalist"/"pro-Milosevic" baiting, to which I think red-baiting has provided a rhetorical structure but is not identical.
Yoshie