Forwarded article by former UN Commander in Yugo

Charles Brown CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us
Mon Apr 12 12:41:19 PDT 1999


>>

>>Activist Mailing List - http://get.to/activist

>>

>>USI, New Delhi

>>April 6, 1999 Lt Gen Satish Nambiar

>>

>>USI, New Delhi, April 6, 1999

>>THE FATAL FLAWS UNDERLYING NATO'S INTERVENTION IN YUGOSLAVIA

>>By

>>Lt Gen Satish Nambiar (Retd.)

>>(First Force Commander and Head of Mission of the United Nations Forces

>>deployed in the former Yugoslavia 03 Mar92 to 02 Mar 93. Former Deputy

>>Chief of Staff, Indian Army. Currently, Director of the United Services

>>Institution of India.)

>>My year long experience as the Force Commander and Head of Mission of the

>>United Nations Forces deployed in the former Yugoslavia has given me an

>>understanding of the fatal flaws of US/NATO policies in the troubled

>region.

>>It was obvious to most people following events in the Balkans since the

>>beginning of the decade, and particularly after the fighting that resulted

>>in the emergence of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and the former

>>Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, that Kosovo was a 'powder keg' waiting to

>>explode. The West appears to have learnt all the wrong lessons from the

>>previous wars and applied it to Kosovo.

>>(1) Portraying the Serbs as evil and everybody else as good was not only

>>counterproductive but also dishonest. According to my experience all sides

>>were guilty but only the Serbs would admit that they were no angels while

>>the others would insist that they were. With 28, 000 forces under me and

>>with constant contacts with UNHCR and the International Red Cross

>officials,

>>we did not witness any genocide beyond killings and massacres on all sides

>>that are typical of such conflict conditions. I believe none of my

>>successors and their forces saw anything on the scale claimed by the

media.

>>(2) It was obvious to me that if Slovenians, Croatians and Bosniaks had

the

>>right to secede from Yugoslavia, then the Serbs of Croatia and Bosnia had

>an

>>equal right to secede. The experience of partitions in Ireland and India

>>has not be pleasant but in the Yugoslavia case, the state had already been

>>taken apart anyway. It made little sense to me that if multiethnic

>>Yugoslavia was not tenable that multiethnic Bosnia could be made tenable.

>>The former internal boundaries of Yugoslavia which had no validity under

>>international law should have been redrawn when it was taken apart by the

>>West, just as it was in the case of Ireland in 1921 and Punjab and Bengal

>in

>>India in 1947. Failure to acknowledge this has led to the problem of

>Kosovo

>>as an integral part of Serbia.

>>(3) It is ironic that the Dayton Agreement on Bosnia was not fundamentally

>>different from the Lisbon Plan drawn up by Portuguese Foreign Minister

>>Cuteliero and British representative Lord Carrington to which all three

>>sides had agreed before any killings had taken place, or even the

>Vance-Owen

>>Plan which Karadzic was willing to sign. One of the main problems was

that

>>there was an unwillingness on the part of the American administration to

>>concede that Serbs had legitimate grievances and rights. I recall State

>>Department official George Kenny turning up like all other American

>>officials, spewing condemnations of the Serbs for aggression and genocide.

>>I offered to give him an escort and to go see for himself that none of

what

>>he proclaimed was true. He accepted my offer and thereafter he made a

>>radical turnaround.. Other Americans continued to see and hear what they

>>wanted to see and hear from one side, while ignoring the other side. Such

>>behaviour does not produce peace but more conflict.

>>(4) I felt that Yugoslavia was a media-generated tragedy. The Western

>media

>>sees international crises in black and white, sensationalizing incidents

>for

>>public consumption. From what I can see now, all Serbs have been driven

>out

>>of Croatia and the Muslim-Croat Federation, I believe almost 850,000 of

>>them. And yet the focus is on 500,000 Albanians (at last count) who have

>>been driven out of Kosovo. Western policies have led to an ethnically

pure

>>Greater Croatia, and an ethnically pure Muslim statelet in Bosnia.

>>Therefore, why not an ethnically pure Serbia? Failure to address these

>>double standards has led to the current one.

>>

>>As I watched the ugly tragedy unfold in the case of Kosovo while visiting

>>the US in early to mid March 1999, I could see the same pattern emerging.

>>In my experience with similar situations in India in such places as

>Kashmir,

>>Punjab, Assam, Nagaland, and elsewhere, it is the essential strategy of

>>those ethnic groups who wish to secede to provoke the state authorities.

>>Killings of policemen is usually a standard operating procedure by

>>terrorists since that usually invites overwhelming state retaliation, just

>>as I am sure it does in the United States.

>>I do not believe the Belgrade government had prior intention of driving

out

>>all Albanians from Kosovo. It may have decided to implement Washington's

>>own "Krajina Plan" only if NATO bombed, or these expulsions could be

>>spontaneous acts of revenge and retaliation by Serb forces in the field

>>because of the bombing. The OSCE Monitors were not doing too badly, and

>the

>>Yugoslav Government had, after all, indicated its willingness to abide by

>>nearly all the provisions of the Rambouillet "Agreement" on aspects like

>>cease-fire, greater autonomy to the Albanians, and so on. But they

>insisted

>>that the status of Kosovo as part of Serbia was not negotiable, and they

>>would not agree to station NATO forces on the soil of Yugoslavia. This is

>>precisely what India would have done under the same circumstances. It was

>>the West that proceeded to escalate the situation into the current

>senseless

>>bombing campaign that smacks more of hurt egos, and revenge and

>retaliation.

>>NATO's massive bombing intended to terrorize Serbia into submission

appears

>>no different from the morality of actions of Serb forces in Kosovo.

>>Ultimatums were issued to Yugoslavia that unless the terms of an agreement

>>drawn up at Rambouillet were signed, NATO would undertake bombing.

>>Ultimatums do not constitute diplomacy. They are acts of war. The

>Albanians

>>of Kosovo who want independence, were coaxed and cajoled into putting

their

>>signatures to a document motivated with the hope of NATO bombing of Serbs

>>and independence later. With this signature, NATO assumed all the legal

>and

>>moral authority to undertake military operations against a country that

>had,

>>at worst, been harsh on its own people. On 24th March 1999, NATO launched

>>attacks with cruise missiles and bombs, on Yugoslavia, a sovereign state,

a

>>founding member of the United Nations and the Non Aligned Movement; and

>>against a people who were at the forefront of the fight against Nazi

>Germany

>>and other fascist forces during World War Two. I consider these current

>>actions unbecoming of great powers.

>>It is appropriate to touch on the humanitarian dimension for it is the

>>innocent who are being subjected to displacement, pain and misery.

>>Unfortunately, this is the tragic and inevitable outcome of all such

>>situations of civil war, insurgencies, rebel movements, and terrorist

>>activity. History is replete with examples of such suffering; whether it

>be

>>the American Civil War, Northern Ireland, the Basque movement in Spain,

>>Chechnya, Angola, Cambodia, and so many other cases; the indiscriminate

>>bombing of civilian centres during World War Two; Hiroshima and Nagasaki;

>>Vietnam. The list is endless. I feel that this tragedy could have been

>>prevented if NATO's ego and credibility had not been given the highest

>>priority instead of the genuine grievances of Serbs in addition to

>>Albanians.

>>Notwithstanding all that one hears and sees on CNN and BBC, and other

>>Western agencies, and in the daily briefings of the NATO authorities, the

>>blame for the humanitarian crisis that has arisen cannot be placed at the

>>door of the Yugoslav authorities alone. The responsibility rests mainly

at

>>NATO's doors. In fact, if I am to go by my own experience as the First

>>Force Commander and Head of Mission of the United Nations forces in the

>>former Yugoslavia, from March 1992 to March 1993, handling operations in

>>Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Macedonia, I would say that reports put

>out

>>in the electronic media are largely responsible for provoking this

tragedy.

>>Where does all this leave the international community which for the record

>>does not comprise of the US, the West and its newfound Muslim allies ? The

>>portents for the future, at least in the short term, are bleak indeed.

The

>>United Nations has been made totally redundant, ineffective, and impotent.

>>The Western world, led by the USA, will lay down the moral values that the

>>rest of the world must adhere to; it does not matter that they themselves

>do

>>not adhere to the same values when it does not suit them. National

>>sovereignty and territorial integrity have no sanctity. And finally,

>>secessionist movements, which often start with terrorist activity, will

get

>>greater encouragement. One can only hope that good sense will prevail,

>>hopefully sooner rather than later.

>>

>>Lt. General Satish Nambiar

>>Director, USI, New Delhi

>>6 April 1999

>>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list