>Daniel, you don't take those idiots more seriously, than, say islamic
>clerics waging a holy war against the "west, do you? Their sole role is
to
>act Rush Limbaugh - babbling nonsense with one and only one goal in mind -
>smearing the "bleeding heart liberals" by any means necessary.
The trouble is there are loads of mainstream liberal economists who "prove"
equally annoying left-wing things in the same manner. Personally, I only
take economics seriously when it deals with money.
>
>I stopped considering economics a science long time ago. At its best it
is
>metaphysics, a relatively coherent system of beliefs how things ought to
be
>according to the tenets of the rat-choice creed, but telling little how
>empirical world actually works. More often, however, it is a jihad
against
>political enemies of the ruling elites waged by a bunch of half-witted
>sycophantic journalists and pundits who do not know, or pretend not to
>know, what they are babbling about and claiming that market-schmarket will
>perform social miracles - even in the areas where its more knowledgeable
>adocates see a potential for an almost certain market failure (e.g. public
>goods or high infromation asymmetry).
>wojtek
Agreed. Though in the case of information asymmetry, you're these days almost bound to get some dumbass with a Californian PhD (don't know why, but it almost always is) coming up with a game-theory or signalling theory explanation. "Finding economic explanations for obviously non-economic phenomena" is the new cottage industry after "Finding game-theoretic proofs of economic things that nobody had been disposed to doubt"
Oh yeh, and anyone using a simple OLS model to prove anything is, IMO, doing something shameful, which they should not wave about in public.
I'm unsubbing for a week -- not in protest at anything, but because the new policy is to have mandatory auto-replies when out of office, and I doubt that everyone wants to hear how to contact my secretary 50 times a day.
cheers
dd
___________________________________________________________________________
_____
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential to the ordinary user of the
e-mail address to which it was addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately on (44) 171 638 5858 and delete the message
from all locations in your computer. You should not copy
this email or use it for any purpose, or disclose its
contents to any person : to do so may be unlawful.
Email is an informal method of communication and is
subject to possible data corruption, either accidentally
or on purpose. Flemings is unable to exercise control
over the content of information contained in
transmissions made via the Internet. For these reasons
it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information
contained on email without obtaining written confirmation
of it.
----------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________
_____
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential to the ordinary user of the
e-mail address to which it was addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately on (44) 171 638 5858 and delete the message
from all locations in your computer. You should not copy
this email or use it for any purpose, or disclose its
contents to any person : to do so may be unlawful.
Email is an informal method of communication and is
subject to possible data corruption, either accidentally
or on purpose. Flemings is unable to exercise control
over the content of information contained in
transmissions made via the Internet. For these reasons
it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information
contained on email without obtaining written confirmation
of it.
----------------------------------------------------------