Doug Henwood wrote:
> Mattcapri at aol.com wrote:
>
> >But wait, has anyone mentioned primitive accumulation yet?
>
> Nope, but that'd be ok. So would be primitive disaccumulation and
> neoprimitive accumulation. And we could interrogate the use of the
> word" primitive."
>
> Doug
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu