>
> In a message dated 12/16/99 1:32:20 AM, sitka at home.com writes:
>
> <<Max Sawicky wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> > I feel for you and them, but nobody has remarked on the
> > dilemma of a movement that is not able to garner credit
> > for what it does, or whose efforts inherently lend
> > themselves to others gaining and using the leverage
> > they may create.
> >
> > That's anarchism. It's implied vacuum in collective
> > decision-making is readily filled by others, for good
> > or for ill.>>
>
> odd, but after 7 years as a member of the Love and rage revolutionary
> anarchist federation I arrived at a similar wrong conclusion. Must be
> something in the beer i guess.
Sorry, I'm a bit confused - what was your conclusion? That someone else would fill the spaces that you deliberately left blank? And why was it wrong? And what do you think now?
Peter -- Peter van Heusden : pvanheus at hgmp.mrc.ac.uk : PGP key available Criticism has torn up the imaginary flowers from the chain not so that man shall wear the unadorned, bleak chain but so that he will shake off the chain and pluck the living flower. - Karl Marx
NOTE: I do not speak for the HGMP or the MRC.