>
>Being gay is emasculation? Come on. It was more a commentary on the whole
>merchadising of black thuggery to white consumers.
yes, now that was interesting. but why did they have to represent him as *that* particular kind of gay Black man? That's the problem. Did he have to be effeminate? A Drama Queen? A gossiper as I recall. Please.
that scene pissed me off the most.