Point one is neatly taken up by Paula. The MAI is an attempt to recognise point 2, but it offered only exacerbated uneven development and dependency - certainly not optimal allocation.
Point 2 is recognised, I suppose, in the US pre-emptive bullying of the UN, its rigid control of WIPO and its betrayal of UNESCO.
And the third speaks loudly to an institutionalist perspective. And I don't see room for any institutionalism in neoliberalism. The former throws the latter's price theory out the window for a start, doesn't it?
There's not much neoliberalism left after that, surely?
Cheers, Rob.