Though one can excoriate Clinton as much as one wants, the fact of the matter is that the EITC and attempt to bring medical welfare to the US (which continues as a "progressive agenda item" at the federal and at the state level, now set as a cover-the-kids issue, which by virtue of covering ages 0-18 and ages 65+ would position the country for full coverage, and tied in all public fora including last year's state of the union, to tobacco revenue of one kind or another) are better than anything that has been done by anyone since Johnson (domestically). I do think that these issues pose a bigger potential win than the loss of traditional welfare as such, and that the support Clinton has had from the black congressional delegation, and community, is rational, not irrational. Better than anything since Johnson may not be objectively "good," but it is still better than anything I've seen in my adult life. And, to be sure, Clinton is not as good (domestically) as Johnson was. But neither is he as bad in terms of overseas commitments.
Anyhow, I see the support for arms and intervention as a very traditional part of the Democratic package, not as a blowjob special. It's not a socialist left type package. But the socialist lefts of Europe also supported their various bombs 'n' rockets packages, in France, England, Germany, and elsewhere.
-- Gregory P. Nowell Associate Professor Department of Political Science, Milne 100 State University of New York 135 Western Ave. Albany, New York 12222
Fax 518-442-5298