Clinton and the military

Greg Nowell GN842 at CNSVAX.Albany.Edu
Tue Jan 19 14:55:59 PST 1999


Boosting the budget is not that illogical. First, it helps California, a key to any national democratic strategy (see the LAT article link posted earlier). Second, virtually all of the "progressive" presidencies in the U.S. have come with a military price tag: Roosevelt's New Deal and Johnson's Great Society. In essence the idea is that you buy support for the role of World Policeman. Nor is this limited to the US. German business class tolerane of unions is "textbook" case of trying to buy off working class to oppose communism (esp when E. Germany didn't look too bad, back in the 1950s); and Kolko & Kolko make a major thesis of social welfare benefits as a "reward" for participating in war in their Century of War.

Though one can excoriate Clinton as much as one wants, the fact of the matter is that the EITC and attempt to bring medical welfare to the US (which continues as a "progressive agenda item" at the federal and at the state level, now set as a cover-the-kids issue, which by virtue of covering ages 0-18 and ages 65+ would position the country for full coverage, and tied in all public fora including last year's state of the union, to tobacco revenue of one kind or another) are better than anything that has been done by anyone since Johnson (domestically). I do think that these issues pose a bigger potential win than the loss of traditional welfare as such, and that the support Clinton has had from the black congressional delegation, and community, is rational, not irrational. Better than anything since Johnson may not be objectively "good," but it is still better than anything I've seen in my adult life. And, to be sure, Clinton is not as good (domestically) as Johnson was. But neither is he as bad in terms of overseas commitments.

Anyhow, I see the support for arms and intervention as a very traditional part of the Democratic package, not as a blowjob special. It's not a socialist left type package. But the socialist lefts of Europe also supported their various bombs 'n' rockets packages, in France, England, Germany, and elsewhere.

-- Gregory P. Nowell Associate Professor Department of Political Science, Milne 100 State University of New York 135 Western Ave. Albany, New York 12222

Fax 518-442-5298



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list