Comparing Mao to Hitler

Henry C.K. Liu hliu at mindspring.com
Sun Jun 6 21:40:35 PDT 1999


There is a vulgarity about this person that is dwarfed only by his bigotry. The issue is not about varying opinions on Mao. The issue was about DeLong illogical accusation of Mao. Without understanding the issue, Max simply jumped in for the racist fun. As I said before: to be called a "lyin' ass" by a self confessed liar is self vindicating. Max is not clever; he is simply crude.

Henry C.K. Liu

Max Sawicky wrote:


> Chris Burford wrote:
>
> > I sense however the question is more fundamental than respect for Mao,
> since it
> > is not controversial that Mao made major errors. It is a question of
> respect for
> > the Chinese people.
>
> This is the reason I suggested the Max and Delong sophmoric ridicule of my
> serious
> reponse the decision making process in Chinese mass movenments racist.
> They find lampooning communist rhetoric funny and used it to refute a
> serious
> staement. Western rhetoric on free market merits and the virtues of
> "democracy"
> sound equally illogical to progressive Asians, yet we don't lampoon it
> because we
> don't enjoy racist humor.
>
> ----------
>
> Yo, Chris --
>
> Where in the wide world of sports did you get the idea that
> Mr. Henry C.K. Liu had been appointed arbiter of who commanded
> respect from the rather numerous Chinese people? Don't you
> imagine quite a few Chinese people of good will think Mao was
> a bag of shit? Or that those associated with the present
> democracy movement have a different view of the current
> regime than our Stalinist billion-dollar fund manager?
>
> Speaking for myself, rather than the capitalist roader DeLong,
> I'd just like to point out that Mr. Henry C.K. Liu reacts to
> criticism by branding the source as racist and claiming it
> is directed at the suffering masses of the world,
> rather than his own sorry, lyin' ass.
>
> mbs



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list