I was reading along, and suddenly it sprung from out of nowhere like a telephone pole coming up the hiway,
Rob Schaap writes: Oops! I wrote:
>It's probably objectification, too (although it
>ain't that simple - a naked woman generates an altogether chemical response
>from us if we're sharing a pool or a sauna with her than if she were to
>display herself with what we take to be an intention to arouse us. Same
>with pictures
but meant: ... an altogether DIFFERENT chemical response ...
Sorry, Rob.
Doyle You mean you pee'd in the pool didn't you? That is how I read it. I don't understand is there another way to read that? regards, Doyle