NATO bombs Chinese embassy

[Henry C.K. Liu]

Today (May 10) WSJ Editorial: "An obvious
question may dawn on Chinese people eventually: Why,
in the middle of such a war, did their government choose
to keep all those people in its embassy and potentially
in harm's way?"

I guess it is China's fault to have an embassy in Yugolsavia.
Barkley, we Chinese are all silly people.  How dare we protest!

Henry

Carl Remick wrote:


> >       I realize that the Chinese media is loudly
> > trumpeting the rejection of Clinton's apology by
> > the Chinese government and is claiming that it
> > was not a mistake.  But that is no reason for you
> > to repeat such silly stuff.  This was obviously an
> > incredibly stupid thing to do, considerably stupider
> > even than starting the bloody war in the first place.
>
> Still, I have been struck by the sullen tone of U.S. media in reporting
> NATO's blunder.  There has been a finger-wagging component in much of
> the coverage, cautioning the Chinese not to get carried away protesting
> this incident.  American morality has been so (further) corrupted by
> NATO's intervention that we now clearly resent third parties for getting
> in the way of our indiscriminate bombing.
>
> Carl Remick