NATO bombs Chinese embassy

[Charles Brown]

No, Henry, I don't think your questioning the mistake claim by the U.S. is silly. Even if it was "unintentional" , it was reckless. But given the U.S. record of lying in such matters, who could trust their mistake claim. What is silly and naive is to accept the U.S. claim of "mistake" at face value, and to not question it.

Charles Brown


>>> "Henry C.K. Liu" <hliu at mindspring.com> 05/10/99 04:04PM >>>
I guess I am silly.

"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." wrote:


> Henry,
>       I realize that the Chinese media is loudly
> trumpeting the rejection of Clinton's apology by
> the Chinese government and is claiming that it
> was not a mistake.  But that is no reason for you
> to repeat such silly stuff.  This was obviously an
> incredibly stupid thing to do, considerably stupider
> even than starting the bloody war in the first place.
>       This morning's Washington Post presents the
> issue as follows.  Supposedly the Chinese embassy
> was located in a different part of Belgrade until just
> a few years ago.  It physically resembles the building
> that was the supposed target.  It is on the same street
> and only about a block away.  It has a low-lying building
> behind it that resembles a warehouse that was thought
> to be a storage area as well.
>       None of this justifies this unjustified bombing, none
> of