On Mon, 01 Nov 1999 09:40:49 -0500 "Charles Brown"
<CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us> writes:
>
>
>
>
>>>> "rc-am" <rcollins at netlink.com.au> 11/01/99 02:11AM >>>ps, ted's
>comments on the absolute integrity of foucault's epistemes was
>about the only accurate comment on foucault i've seen thus far.
>
>((((((((((((
>
>Charles: What means "absolute integrity" ? Is this a mathematical
>concept ?
To rephrase Charles' question what would an episteme that was lacking in "absolute integrity" be like? How would we be able to distinguish one from the other?
Jim F.
>
>CB
>
___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.