glass steagall

Max Sawicky sawicky at epinet.org
Fri Nov 5 11:24:27 PST 1999



>Other countries have no equivalent of Glass-Steagall; they have
>large, universal banks. And many of those other countries have more
>egalitarian distributions of income and fewer financial crises than
>does the U.S. It's how you regulate and supervise the beasts that
>matters. All that populist inheritance about dispersal of ownership
>deserves a decent burial.

I think you're a little hasty there, Doug. Arguably, "those other countries have more egalitarian distributions of income and fewer financial crises" *despite* having large, universal banks. I can't see how it helps the quality of U.S. life to have retrograde social policies *and* the greater concentration of capital that will result from abolition of Glass-Steagall. Carl
>>>>>>>

Ditto-rama. The S&L bailout was a foretaste of what we could be in for after Glass-Steagall. The distribution of gains and losses resulting from that event and its remedy was not an advance for economic justice.

mbs



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list