> It seems to me that the Supremes haven't recently been asked what
> they think about the 2nd,
Is it they haven't been asked, or that they won't say/
I know that there has not been a case since the thirties decided, but I thought they have declined review on some case in the past few years.
[Please let that '/' above stand in for a question mark -- I'm at some bastard keyboard that won't give a q.m. shifted or no]
--
Joseph Noonan jfn1 at msc.com