>Your post of Fausto-Sterling is a critique of Carrol, not me. That is,
it's a
>rebuttal of his contention that it was equally possible to make a biological
>argument that there is is only one sex, as that there is two. The idea that
>there is only one sex was all I was criticizing. That's why I called this
>thread "only one sex?".
steven gould says the same as yoshie pointed out.
kelley