Yes, very interesting. I am not sure how important it is except that for Clinton as for Mo Mowlam the gloss has gone off the Irish Peace process.
There is now a long drawn out war of political attrition. The IRA will adamantantly not disarm and are only prepared to consider rust as an agent of disarmament. What they are playing for is the radical restructuring of the armed forces of the Protestant triumphalist state. The report by the former conservative party politician and last governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten, has proposed radical changes to the "Royal Irish Constabulary" including its name. But everything lies in the detail and the vigour with which it is implemented.
Trimble cannot get on with a power sharing government without the acquiescence of his constituency. As I read it, the IRA will not give up arms without the effective abolition of the RUC. Even with very generous inducements for early retirement this may take 10 years to resolve.
I would predict a further long period of political attrition rather than a recommencement of the war (since the IRA know they cannot win that - they can only stalemate the Brits), there will be some compromise. Although Clinton's public words may have been a gaff he may well have not minded the message of impatience getting back to the participants. This would fit with the low profile of Mo Mowlam in the Labour Party recently (even allowing for some friction between her and Blair about what to do.)
If the northern Irish want US inward investment they had better accommodate to the rationality of finance capital. Meanwhile the economy of the Irish Republic continues to expand.
Chris Burford
London