That the State does something people want does not mean whatever is done should be rejected on principle. By your logic, the State provides Food Stamps for the same evil reasons. But you wouldn't say that FS should be rejected. At least, I hope not.
> Through the war on crimes, we've lost and had curtailed many civil
> liberties already. Why? Because enough people have felt that we must
give
> more power to the state in order to punish criminals. Thus, a desire to
> punish or destroy minor criminals ends up punishing the entire masses of
> people. Remember that Biblical metaphor? Selling our birthright for a
> mess of pottage.
More or fewer civil liberties is a different matter. Civil liberties are not inconsistent with law enforcement, though conservative thinking would argue otherwise.
Executions are not going to make the world much of a better place. Some things are just right and have little or no instrumental importance. I don't believe the existence of CP plays any important role in social control of the masses w/respect to other issues.
What offends me is that anti-capital punishment appeals like the one that started this thread typically focus on the suffering of those who deserve no sympathy and block out the suffering of those who do. The latter become non-persons. To me this is emotionally incoherent. I don't mind a reasoned argument against CP. Chances are I would buy a lot of it. But hand-wringing over the condemned is one of my buttons. Push it, and the board will light up.
In re:/Philion, there is no glee in an execution, since it is a reminder of something that really is tragic.
mbs