Zizek on Havel

[rc-am]

ken is not a postmodernist.  zizek is not a postmodernist.  havel is not a
postmodernist.  kant is not a postmodernist.  zizek critizises havel for
being neitzschean.  he does not criticise havel from a nietzcshean
perspective.  ken has argued for a non-violent strategy.  he has not argued
for removing the initiative of the masses from politics.

what about this is so impossible to understand?  oh, i forgot:
understanding is one thing, enjoyment in the game is another.

one day soon, i hope basic reading skills become more widespread amongst
licensed intellectuals.

Angela
_________