non-commutativity in the brain

bill fancher fancher at
Wed Apr 5 11:15:57 PDT 2000

on 4/5/00 10:36 AM, Scott Martens at smartens at wrote:

> I still have never seen a reasonable challenge to Chomsky's poverty of
> stimulus argument, so I do think language has to be biologically motivated.

I wrote earlier, in response to your previous endorsement of this "argument":

> I always understood that argument to be: look how fast kids learn language,
> therefore behaviorism is false and language is innate. Did I miss some
> subtlety?

You did not respond. If I have misconstrued the argument, please say how. If not, refutation is hardly required.

-- bill

More information about the lbo-talk mailing list