>Isn't the notion of victimless crime problematic with regards, at least, to
>drugs? Given the spillover effects [drivin' while blind, beating up whoever
>while blind etc.] doesn't the other side's argument score a few pretty
>significant points on these issues?
Driving while blasted and beating someone up while blasted are and should be crimes. Why should being blasted while doing no harm to others be criminalized?
Doug