Ambiguity as legal decision making

James Baird jlbaird3 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 5 00:55:00 PST 2000


Couldn't it also have been meant as a warning to the Fla. Supremes that they will be reversed if they issue any rulings for Gore? Sort of a "horsehead in the bed" approach?

God, this shit is getting better and better. If Scalia is Luca Brasi, what does that make Renquist?

Jim Baird

--- Nathan Newman <nathan at newman.org> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Schwartz" <jkschw at hotmail.com>
>
> >Charles, et al, are dead on. Why _did_ the Supremes
> take this case if this
> >is all they had to say? --jks
>
> I think the conservatives wanted it, but then
> realized if they issued a 5-4
> decision, the Court would enter the delegitimacy
> demolition derby.
>
> So they kicked it hoping that by the time all the
> other issues involved in
> the contest fights get back to them, they can pick
> up a couple of the
> liberals
>
> That's my theory at least- the conservatives
> obviously delivered a partial
> propaganda win for Bush, so they got a small gain
> politically from taking
> the case rather than just upholding the Fl SC.
>
> -- Nathan Newman
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list