Doctors Saving Lives & Growing Potatoes in Russia

Gordon Fitch gcf at panix.com
Tue Dec 19 06:12:51 PST 2000



>
Gar Lipow wrote:
> > True as far as it goes. Medical professionals should practice medicine.
> > But there are quite a few other types work which save lives within the
> > medical profession. Nurses, aides, medical technicians ("luxuries which
> > capitalism is destroying in Russia) are every bit as essential as
> > doctors. Our own U.S. health care system is destroying itself by a war
> > on these profession.

Carrol Cox:
> There is a contradiction that might operate [pun] under socialism
> (or any regime) as well as under current capitalism. The survival
> rate of surgical patients in a hospital is in more or less direct
> proportion to the number of that type of surgery performed in
> a given hospital. The reasons for this bear out Gar's argument
> that "there are quite a few other types work which save
> lives within the medical profession," but in an uncomfortable
> way. The more times a surgical team performs an operation,
> the higher its success ratio. This means that one has to choose
> between (a) overworked medical teams or (b) lower rate
> of survival of patients.
>
> There are ways to get around the production of elites insofar
> as that 'production' has political or economic roots (differences
> in education, etc.). But when it is sheer quantity of practice
> that creates an elite, *that* is hard to get around.

In the case of medical teams (and others) the case may be more complex than one of simple aggregate practice time. For instance, some teams may be selected for further practice on the basis of past success. That, in turn, may depend on the ability to select the best cases. And some teams may have more political power than others, and thus be able to command more and better resources. I don't know enough about medical practice to say more, but these effects are certainly noticed in other forms of production.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list