Defending Martyrs, Reclaiming Memory & History (was Re: Leonard Peltier + Working within the system)

Yoshie Furuhashi furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Tue Dec 19 22:22:11 PST 2000


Carrol says:


>Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> > It is not the case that the Left prefers an association with violence
>> to non-violence. The Left -- or _any other political force_ for that
>> matter -- makes a cause out of *martyrs* . . .
>
>A tentative suggestion. I've always sort of acted from the slogan,
>We will accept casualties but we will not be martyrs. We would
>rather win Mumia's freedom than celebrate him as a martyr.

Of course, yes, we'd rather free Mumia & Leonard; moreover, we should _not_ choose martyrdom (_unless_ that is _the only remaining option_). In the event of any defeat (and defeats have & will be more numerous than victories under capitalism), however, we'll have to _make the best of it_, just as Frederick Douglass & other abolitionists, black or white, made the best of the martyrdom of John Brown -- the martyrdom which Brown did _not_ choose.


>This is, I fear, against the grain of the language as used, but I
>thought I would toss it in. I tend to associate "martyr" with
>Christian Martyrs, with many of whom I have little sympathy.
>We want to destroy capitalism and build socialism, not merely
>bear witness to that desire.

I've been thinking, for instance, of Palestinian struggles. Funerals among Palestinians (as well as many other peoples) have been political -- catalyzing popular sentiments, inciting & steeling the masses for further struggles with stepped-up militancy.

It is not for nothing that Sergei Eisenstein chose to make the funeral of the slain revolutionary sailor Vakulinchuk's funeral one of the central building blocks of _Potemkin_.


>But in any case the need to recapture and preserve our history
>is core, as Yoshie says. Solidarity must extend in time as well
>as in space or it loses its grip on us.

***** We need history, but not the way a spoiled loafer in the garden of knowledge needs it.

Nietzsche, Of the Use and Abuse of History

Not man or men but the struggling, oppressed class itself is the depository of historical knowledge. In Marx it appears as the last enslaved class, as the avenger that completes the task of liberation in the name of generations of the downtrodden. This conviction, which had a brief resurgence in the Spartacist group, has always been objectionable to Social Democrats. Within three decades they managed virtually to erase the name of Blanqui, though it had been the rallying sound that had reverberated through the preceding century. Social Democracy thought fit to assign to the working class the role of the redeemer of future generations, in this way cutting the sinews of its greatest strength. This training made the working class forget both its hatred and its spirit of sacrifice, for both are nourished by the image of enslaved ancestors rather than that of liberated grandchildren.

(Walter Benjamin, "On the Concept of History," <http://www.tasc.ac.uk/depart/media/staff/ls/WBenjamin/CONCEPT2.html>) *****

While Benjamin may have erred a little too disturbingly & messianically on the side of the past against the future, we should still remember his remarks upon Social Democracy "cutting the sinews" of the proletariat's "greatest strength": historical knowledge, especially in the form of popular memories.

Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list