"christian a. gregory" wrote:
> I have my reasons for thinking this is true, though I'd like to know yours.
> Partly because I think you could argue something like the opposite: i.e.
> that in emphasizing the "malign invisible hand" of the market and the
> consequences of competition on an international level (pace Lenin),
> Brenner's argument requires some idea of real-world integration or
> "globalness" to economic activity.
This is too allusive and elliptical for me. Could you explain?
Carrol