Any split that leaves Pol Pot on the other side sounds like a very good idea...
And recall that the people who "worked out the future in the future" created a politics reminiscent of Nero and thought that the key to economics was to combine some of the least attractive features of serfdom with some of the least attractive features of the German World War I economy. They were *desperately* in need of guidance, and did not get it.
Just one little Utopian speech laying out a future Communist society with--I don't know--a bicameral legislature with chambers elected on the basis of industry and of domicile? Immediate potential recall and replacement of representatives? Freedom of the press? Rotating capital funds offering everyone a chance to plan a new enterprise? Selection of high political officials by lot? Anything more specific and less mushy than the "Critique of the Gotha Program" might well have saved a lot of people.
Brad DeLong