>Singer in fact quotes this passage in _Practical Ethics_ (p. 108) and
>discusses its implications for his argument against speciesism when
>considering who is to have personhood:
>***** Mill's argument for preferring the life of a human being to that
of
>an animal (with which most modern readers would be quite comfortable) is
>exactly paralleled by his argument for preferring the life of an
>intelligent human being to that of a fool. Given the context and the way
>in which the term "fool" was commonly used in his day, it seems likely
that
>by this he means what we would now refer to as a person with an
>intellectual disability.
I dispute that the context shows this at all, and on the basis of my limited knowledge of contemporary literature, would suggest that Singer is bluffing when he implies that "fool" preserved its medieval sense into the nineteenth century. Mill is quite clearly saying here that it's better to be a person like him, who speaks Greek and reads poetry than to drink gin, eat oysters and shag, no matter how enjoyable that might be.
dd
___________________________________________________________________________ _____
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential to the ordinary user of the
e-mail address to which it was addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately on (44) 20 7638 5858 and delete the message
from all locations in your computer. You should not copy
this email or use it for any purpose, or disclose its
contents to any person : to do so may be unlawful.
Email is an informal method of communication and is
subject to possible data corruption, either accidentally
or on purpose. Flemings is unable to exercise control
over the content of information contained in
transmissions made via the Internet. For these reasons
it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information
contained on email without obtaining written confirmation
of it.
----------------------------------------------------------