In general, if you don't think there is anybody you would trust making decisions on legal definitions, what are you demonstrating for in Seattle and elsewhere ? Who will decide the statutes, definitions and cases that arise out of the progressive laws you are trying to win ? If you are in the Labor Party, who will decide what a "job" is in the Constitutional right to a "job" ? Or is it that you are against all laws because Rehnquist is chief justice , and will deciding what the words mean ?
CB
>>> Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> 03/15/00 01:47PM >>>
Charles Brown wrote:
>So , I say the political value of freedom from racism is more
>important than the value of freedom of speech.
And who will decide what qualifies as "racism," and therefore unprotected? You? Bill Clinton? William Rehnquist? David Duke?
Doug