radicals guide to fashion chic

kelley kwalker2 at gte.net
Thu May 4 00:03:14 PDT 2000


At 02:03 PM 5/3/00 -0500, Carrol Cox wrote:


>I said nothing about irony in this post. I merely noted that you had
>somewhat solemnly failed to note Seth's irony. And there was no
>need for him to signal it. Anyone who follows this list at all knows
>that Seth is not really opposed to dancing and gambling -- hence
>it was not at all difficult to pick up on his casual irony. But it is
>interesting to note how often those who see irony as a religion
>rather than a rhetorical mode can't see it when it bites them
>on the nose.
>
>Carrol

oh carrol take it up with doug, 'k? i was asking you to address your older thematic and thought i might toss something out there. i have *never* disagreed with you about the difficulty of getting irony. never engaged you on the topic to ever before either, tho i've read you. you've got a beef with doug. hey wotevA. i just tossed something in that i've meant to post for a long time and wanted your comment.

back to filtering 'k?

kelley

oh and also, seth *rarely* posts so no no one would know about his penchant for dance andmerriment. absurd statement. get the stick outta your ass. hey max, wanna lob in there something like, "you do it yourself, as well" now it's time for self ironic observation therapy, i swear.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list