>Subject: Prince Charles v. scientists
>
>[Recalling Doug's great fondness for HRH Charles, I thought I'd pass on the
>following Guardian article, which I just noticed Mark Jones posted on, ah,
>another list.]
>
>Angry Charles warns scientists of disaster
>
>John Vidal and James Meek
But of course, the old false dichotomy between blind faith in amoral science, or blind faith in religion and unknowable divine design. This, coming from someone whose claim to legitimacy and authority is based on 'divine right' , the prowess of his ancestors with a broadsword or an executioners axe and truly medieval rules of succession.
Thanks for the advice, but no thanks. I'll take my cues from someone who isn't inbred and doesn't have a vested interest in sucking up to the C of E.
PC N Paul Childs 5967-157 Avenue Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5Y 2P3
MS-Messenger: npchilds at hotmail.com
'It has to start somewhere. It has to start some time. What better place than here? What better time than now?'
-RATM, Guerrilla Radio